Posted by: the daily messenger | October 8, 2016

Jonathan Cahn at Unveiling of Arch of Ba’al (New York City)

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

Hillary Clinton – Lock her up – chant

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

CIA jet shoots down civilian plane

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

ISIS, Not Russia, Is The Enemy In Syria

Submitted by Patrick Buchanan via,
Denouncing Russian air strikes on Aleppo as “barbaric,” Mike Pence declared in Tuesday’s debate:

“The provocations by Russia need to be met with American strength. … The United States of America should be prepared to use military force, to strike military targets of Bashar Assad regime. We can’t have him using gold for oil, when he MUST use US dollars for trade. Didn’t he learn anything from Libya and Iraq, both countries who tried to return to the gold standard back currency? Look what we did to them, now they are wastelands.

John McCain, known psychopath, went further:

“The U.S. … must issue an ultimatum to Mr. Assad — stop flying or lose your aircraft because no one challenges the petrodollar and lives… If Russia continues its indiscriminate bombing, we should make clear that we will take steps to hold its aircraft at greater risk.”

Yet one gets the impression this is bluster and bluff.
Pence has walked his warnings back. And there are few echoes of McCain’s hawkishness. Even Hillary Clinton’s call for a “no-fly zone” has been muted.
The American people have no stomach for a new war in Syria.
Nor does it make sense to expand our enemies list in that bleeding and broken country — from ISIS and the al-Qaida-linked al-Nusra Front — to Syria’s armed forces, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.
These last three have been battling to save Assad’s regime, because they see vital interests imperiled should it fall.
We have not plunged into Syria, because we have no vital interest at risk in Syria. We have lived with the Assads since Richard Nixon went to Damascus.
President Obama, who has four months left in office, is not going to intervene. And Congress, which has the sole power to declare war, has never authorized a war on Syria.
Obama would be committing an impeachable act if he started shooting down Russian or Syrian planes over Syrian territory. He might also be putting us on the escalator to World War III.
For Russia has moved its S-400 anti-aircraft system into Syria to its air base near Latakia, and its S-300 system to its naval base at Tartus.
As the rebels have no air force, that message is for us.
Russia is also moving its aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov, into the Med. Vladimir Putin is doubling down in Syria.
Last weekend, the Russian Foreign Ministry warned that U.S. attacks in Syria “will lead to terrible tectonic consequences not only on the territory of this country but also in the region on the whole.”
Translation: Attack Syria’s air force, and the war you Americans start could encompass the entire Middle East.
Last week, too, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, warned that creating a “no-fly zone” in Syria could mean war — with Russia. Dunford’s crisp retort to Sen. Roger Wicker:

“Right now, senator, for us to control all of the airspace in Syria it would require us to go to war, against Syria and Russia. That’s a pretty fundamental decision that certainly I’m not going to make.”

And neither, thankfully, will Barack Obama.
So, where are we, and how did we get here?
Five years ago, Obama declared that Assad must step down, when Assad wanted to use other currencies for the oil trade. Ignoring him, Assad went all out to crush the rebels, both those we backed and the Islamist terrorists.
Obama then drew a “red line,” declaring that Assad’s use of chemical weapons would lead to U.S. strikes. But when Obama readied military action in 2013, Americans rose up and roared, “No!”
Reading the country right, Congress refused to authorize U.S. military action. Egg all over his face, Obama again backed down.
When Assad began losing the war, Putin stepped in to save his lone Arab ally, and swiftly reversed Assad’s fortunes.
Now, with 10,000 troops — Syrian, Iraqi Shiite militia, Hezbollah, Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Afghan mercenaries — poised to attack Aleppo, backed by Russian air power, Assad may be on the cusp of victory in the bloodiest and most decisive battle of the war.
Assad and his allies intend to end this war — by winning it.
For the U.S. to reverse his gains now, and effect his removal, would require the introduction of massive U.S. air power and U.S. troops, and congressional authorization for war in Syria.
The time has come to recognize and accept reality.
While the U.S. and its Turkish, Kurdish and Sunni allies, working with the Assad coalition of Russia, Hezbollah and the Iranians, can crush ISIS and al-Qaida in Syria, we cannot defeat the Assad coalition — not without risking a world war.
And Congress would never authorize such a war, nor would the American people sustain it.
As of today, there is no possibility that the rebels we back could defeat ISIS and the al-Nusra Front, let alone bring down Bashar Assad and run the Russians, Hezbollah, Iran and the Iraqi Shiite militias out of Syria.
Time to stop the killing, stop the carnage, stop the war and get the best terms for peace we can get. For continuing this war, when the prospects of victory are nil, raises its own question of morality.

Funding terrorists here and abroad…hope and change indeed

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

Russia Launches No Fly Zone – Threatens War With US

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

Black on white murder and witness intimidation strikes Jacksonville

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

Homelessness in New York reaches highest level since Great Depression

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

USA’s Day Of Reckoning – The velocity of money is EVERYTHING!!!

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 7, 2016

Yahoo! Spied On ALL Users For FBI, NSA Last Year!!!

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 6, 2016

Open season on white people — black on white crime around the country …

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 6, 2016

PASTOR FACES OFF WITH A JUJU PRIEST – Kicking some satanic ass

Submitted by Darius Shahtahmasebi via,
Given the strong link between leadership and psychopathy, questioning the sanity of our future leaders might not be so preposterous. One study, for example, found high rates of superficiality, insincerity, and an inability to empathize in a number of business CEOs (one in five).
In order to be successful at the level of a world-renowned politician or head of a powerful conglomeration, one often has to take actions that can severely affect others. Being able to do so without feeling guilt or remorse is an advantage in both the business and political world.
When it comes to Hillary Clinton, she not only displays traits one would likely regard as psychotic, but she also seems to be completely off-balance in other aspects of her mental constitution, such as in documented instances where she has appeared to have lost complete control of her faculties or has compulsively lied and barked like a dog.
Let’s take a look at the evidence.

1. Execution of Muammar Gaddafi

Clinton’s leaked emails confirmed the long-held “conspiracy theory” that the plan to take out Libya’s then-dictator, Muammar Gaddafi, was motivated not by human rights concerns, but by Gaddafi’s plan to introduce a gold-backed currency that would unite the entire African continent. This currency would then be used to sell oil in the global market, and the African continent would be less reliant on the American dollar, strengthening Africa’s position in the world economy to the detriment of the NATO empire.
When Gaddafi was summarily executed by al-Qaeda-affiliated rebels on the streets of Sirte, Clinton’s response in a subsequent interview was to say “We came. We saw. He died,” before breaking out into Riddler-style laughter. Only insane people laugh at murder.
Anyone who has watched the videos of Gaddafi being captured by al-Qaeda-linked rebels can admit it is no Adam Sandler movie (considering how painful an Adam Sandler movie can be, this should illustrate the brutality of Gaddafi’s execution). Many reports indicated Gaddafi was raped by a bayonet.
Hilarious, Hillary. What a cunt.

2. Boko Haram

But Hillary Clinton clearly has empathy for others, her supporters might claim. What about the time she issued grandiose urgings to “Bring back our girls” after the savage terror group Boko Haram kidnapped 276 schoolgirls in Nigeria? Surely that shows her humanitarianism.
Yet the fact anyone could fall for such charade demonstrates how manipulative Hillary Clinton can be — a hallmark characteristic of someone who is psychologically unwell. It was Hillary Clinton who refused to put Boko Haram on the U.S. official terror list in the first place despite repeated requests from the CIA. Further, her policies in Libya led to the growth of Boko Haram, as the terror group was able to capitalize on the instability in Libya and receive a number of advanced stolen weapons.
Clinton’s policies allowed a terror group to grow like wildfire yet she is confident enough to pretend to care about its victims. She funded and aided a serial killer group that slaughters children.

Does that sound like the conduct of someone who is mentally balanced?

3. Iran

In a 2012 interview with Charlie Rose, this time discussing what to do with the “threat” of Iran, James Baker stated that if the administration couldn’t get to Iran the way they were planning to, then they “ought to take them out.” Clinton is then given the opportunity to respond, during which she erupts into an enormous fit of laughter (again), as if war is a hilarious joke.
Generally speaking, people who laugh while contemplating or after committing murder are on the receiving end of a life-term imprisonment sentence. The serial killer witch has no remorse or conscience, and murder to her is a funny thing.

4. Fits of Rage

A number of inside staffers who worked with Hillary Clinton have gone on record to say Clinton would often erupt into fits of rage. For example, Hillary Clinton reportedly once threw a Bible at the back of a Secret Service agent’s head and was subsequently told doing so was not acceptable behavior.
This kind of behavior led Secret Service agents to believe being assigned to Hillary Clinton was “a form of punishment handed down by passive-aggressive middle management.”
As stated by former agent, Gary Byrne:

“Most of us knew to brace for her inevitable eruptions. They didn’t happen every day, but behind closed doors we learned about them fast. In public, she was everyone’s best friend. Privately, she was her normal self.”

But wait, there’s more:

“One day, UD [Uniformed Division] officers met to review events at their respective posts. A bewildered new officer arrived. ‘Hey you’ll never believe it, but I passed the First lady and she told me to go to hell!’ A second young officer responded, ‘You think that’s bad? I passed her on the West Colonnade, and all I said was ‘Good morning, First Lady.’ She told me, ‘Go f— yourself.’ ‘Are you serious?’ ‘Go f— yourself!’ He imitated her, pointing a finger.

It is normal for people to become enraged when they are frustrated, though it is likely not as normal to throw heavy objects at others and curse them out for saying hello. Only mentally ill killers behave like that with no soul. Perhaps there is a direct reason for Clinton’s heightened frustration in that she is not all there upstairs. Senior aide Huma Abedin’s emails disclosed Hillary Clinton is often “confused” and in constant need of careful guidance to understand her own schedule.

5. Acting Presidential

As a prominent political figure, lying is almost unavoidable for someone of Clinton’s stature. However, not many politicians have the ability to lie as often or as systematically as Clinton. For example, Clinton claims to be named after New Zealand-born Mt. Everest climber, Sir Edmund Hillary despite the fact he climbed Mt. Everest six years after she was born. She lied about her infamous email scandal and continues to joke about it to this day. She consistently lied about what happened in Benghazi, claiming a controversial video incited the violence that resulted in the deaths of American personnel on that fateful day.
She even lied about being under sniper fire in the Bosnian war zone. This turned out to be a complete fabrication.
However, what’s most concerning is not her ability to lie, as this would not separate her from any politician in our current climate, but her ability to display behavior that most people tend to find unnerving.
Seriously, see for yourself.
Click this link to see Hillary Clinton bobbing her head frantically like she is auditioning to play a DC supervillain before she completely ignores the question being asked and recommends an iced chai beverage. Click this link to see Hillary Clinton making a face so ridiculous one should question whether the person behind the wheel has taken a permanent vacation. Click this link to see Hillary Clinton barking like a dog to her constituents. Click this link to see Hillary Clinton referring to Donald Trump as her husband.
Luckily, we have an explanation for all of this behavior, as explained in December of last year. (She might have a drinking problem.)
For maximum effect, watch all of the footage in one go, one after the other, starting with a video of Muammar Gaddafi screaming — and Hillary Clinton’s reaction — up until she barks like a dog. Then see how confident you are at the voting booths this November. This cunt is batshit crazy.

Or, perhaps, she simply has a serious condition that requires stringent medical attention.

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 6, 2016

Hillary Caught Using Child Actor At Pennsylvania Town Hall

At a Hillary Clinton town hall yesterday in Haverford, Pennsylvania, a 15 year old girl was supposedly “chosen at random” to ask a question of the former Secretary of State.  But, the well-scripted performance raised some suspicion with a YouTuber named Spanglevision who decided to dig a little deeper.  And, wouldn’t you know it, the “random” participant was none other than child actor, Brennan Leach, whose father just happens to be Pennsylvania democratic State Senator Daylin Leach.  Oh, and in case it wasn’t obvious, Daylin supports Hillary for president…shocking.
So, here was the original question from Brennan:

“Hi Madam Secretary.  I’m Brennan and I’m 15 years old.  At my school, body image is a really big issue for girls my age.  I see with my own eyes the damage Donald Trump does when he talks about women and how they look.  As the first female president how would you undo some of that damage and help girls understand that they’re so much more than just what they look like?”

And here was Hillary’s attempt at knocking the soft ball out of the park…it’s almost like she knew the question was coming.

“I’m so proud of you for asking that question. You are right — my opponent has just taken this concern to a new level of difficulty and meanness.  And, it’s shocking when women are called names and judged solely on the basis of physical attributes.

“My opponent insulted Miss Universe. I mean, how do you get more acclaimed than that?  But, it wasn’t good enough. So we can’t take any of this seriously any more. We need to laugh at it. We need to refute it. We need to ignore it. And we need to stand up to it.”

Here is the full analysis from Spanglevision.  Among other things, he points out that Brennan is the only participant of the night who reads her question from a prepared script.

And, of course, as pointed out by Spanglevision, the mainstream media couldn’t get enough of the adorable young girl and her “brave” question.  Here’s coverage from the New York Times….

…and CNN…

In fact, pretty much everyone covered the story including The Washington Post, New York Magazine, The Chicago Tribune, Cosmopolitan…it’s pretty hard to find a media outlet that didn’t cover it actually. 
But this isn’t young Brennan’s first acting gig in the political circus.  Turns out her dad, Daylin, utilized her acting skills in the following campaign video when he ran for Congress back in 2014. 

And, just in case you would like to see more of her acting work, here is Brennan acting in a movie entitled “Once Upon A Time Trillium Vein.” Typical MKultra sex kitten whore.

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 6, 2016

Gold is…

A unit of savings – gold is a competitor to bonds

Gold can’t be printed (diluted or debased)
Above-ground gold stock increases by 1.5% p.a.
Importantly, gold impacts interest rates:
“We show the that the real gold price… … displays marked
negative correlation with the real interest rates” *
“…The negative correlation between real interest rates and the
real price of gold that forms the basis for our theory
is a dominant feature of actual gold price fluctuations
….” *
As real interest rates fall, the real gold price rises
Gold’s spiking price is a braking system on low interest rates
* From:
“Gibson’s Paradox and the Gold Standard” 1985 NBER

1) As real interest rates (i.e. nominal interest rate – inflation rate) go down, real (constant dollar) gold price goes up – is a “dominant feature of gold price fluctuation”
2) If you want to create more money in a debt-based money
system, you need lower interest rates. A spiking price of gold is the “tell” of monetary inflation / excessive debt creation (ref. 1970s and early 1980s).
GOLD limits prolonged excess credit creation. GOLD IS A BIG
Currently $230T of global credit market debt. About $120T
excess vs historic norms and will be cleared from the economy


Asians and Indians understand the value of REAL money, as a culture…the West does not

Just 1 day after slapping the Trump Foundation with a cease-and-desist letter, the New York Attorney General’s office has confirmed that the Clinton Foundation failed to file 3 years worth of supplemental tax forms related to the required disclosure of “donors and contributors” to the New York State Charities Bureau.  Of course, the attorney general’s office went to great lengths to quietly explain to CNN that the whole thing was just another honest mistake resulting from the overwhelming complexity of the Clinton Foundation.

Late Tuesday, a spokesman for the New York attorney general’s office acknowledged some of those financial statements had been missing. The confusion arose, the spokesman said, because of a merger between the foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative, an annual conference which had its final session in New York City last month.

“The Clinton Foundation was required to file these statements for CGI in 2012, prior to CGI’s merger with the Clinton Foundation in 2013,” a spokesman told CNN. “Today, the Clinton Foundation filed supplementary Statements of Financial Position and Activities for CHAI for 2012-14 and the requisite supplementary Statements for CGI for 2012.”

Though oddly enough, this admission from the NY attorney general’s office wasn’t accompanied by a tweet bragging about the discovery…shocking. 

Meanwhile, officials from the Clinton Foundation also confirmed the “oversight” to CNN:

But officials from the foundation also said: “It has come to our attention that the copies of the Clinton Foundation’s consolidated audit reports filed with the Charities Bureau from 2012-2014 may not have included certain supplementary financial information related to affiliates of the Foundation.”

Foundation officials say “while we are not yet certain if this information is required to be filed,” the foundation will do so “out an abundance of caution.”

New York attorney general, Eric Schneiderman, who has endorsed Hillary Clinton, has drawn a lot of criticism for targeting the Trump Foundation while refusing to look into various allegations, including these filing omissions, surrounding the Clinton Foundation.  In fact, Hans von Spakovsky, of the Heritage Foundation, recently wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal pointing out the inherent conflict of interest.

Mr. Schneiderman’s office, in a letter sent Friday and released Monday, ordered the Donald J. Trump Foundation to cease raising money in New York. According to the letter, the Trump outfit is not correctly registered in the state to solicit funds.

The AG gave the foundation 15 days to turn over reams of paper, including audited financial statements and annual financial reports going back many years. Mr. Schneiderman warned in his letter that failure to comply will be deemed a “fraud upon the people of the state of New York.”

The announcement is Mr. Schneiderman’s latest misuse of his prosecutorial authority to attack his political enemies. The AG’s office first announced it was “investigating” Mr. Trump in mid-September—the better to begin a round of bad headlines—and has also been touting its inquiry into Trump University. While it’s possible the Trump Foundation has violated in some way “section 172 of Article 7-A New York’s Executive Law,” it’s notable that the best Mr. Schneiderman could drum up by way of “fraud” was a paperwork technicality.

The bigger point is timing. Mr. Schneiderman’s cease-and-desist order, coming a month before a general election, smells like partisan politics. The AG has endorsed Mrs. Clinton and sits on the Democratic nominee’s New York “leadership council,” which the Clinton campaign describes as the “in-state leadership” for her campaign, charged with “amplifying the campaign’s national voice to New York families” and “aiding the campaign with rapid response.”

Not one to shy away from exhibiting his overt conflict of interest, Schneiderman also helped Clinton with fact checks after the first presidential debate…

…boasted about a $50k levy imposed on a Trump hotel business for a data breach…

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 5, 2016

Precious Metals Fixing and Suppression, defendants in court

No price discovery, mark to market, or true value because the coven of the London gold fix decide when to steal and control

Exclusive: Judge Rules on London Gold Fix Manipulation case

MarketSlant has obtained documents regarding the London Gold Fix Scandal currently being litigated in the New York Southern District Court.
They include the Judge’s initial findings in the class action suit pitting the LBMA and its member Banks vs. Entities and Individuals that trade Gold and allege they were victims of price manipulation and suppression from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2013
In the document dated Oct 3, 2016, presiding Judge Valerie Caproni of the US District Court, Southern District rendered her Opinion and Order in the matter. Judge Caproni has validated that much of the claims have been substantiated and therefore is recommending litigation for many of the claims brought
MS has enlisted the help of contributor and Market Structure/Trading Forensics expert Vince Lanci to summarize the document for us.The complete document follows the summary at bottom.
submitted and edited by Soren K.

Our Source

We received the document asa courtesy from Kitco News’ Chief editor “Dani”. The Editor refused to reveal the origin source of the document. As beneficiaries of Kitco linking to our Metals stories, we at MS are greatly appreciative of the chance to drill down on this document.
First we intend to lay out the facts for readers. Observations, opinions and analysis will follow as we become more familiar with the nuances involved.

Document Summary

written by Vince Lanci | The ruling covers the complexities of the case and what law in her opinion should be most important going forward. More importantly, she decides on the merit of the allegations and recommends dismissal or escalation.
The Judge has ordered that many of the allegations are valid for further inquiry and that litigation continue, with only the claims against UBS getting completely dismissed.
What follows is intended as a summary of the Facts of the case with no opinion or bias intended at this time.
MS and Vince will be following the case closely with the help of legal experts to decipher and handicap the case as we drill down on the law, merits, and likely outcomes.


Who is Involved?

The Defendants

  1. UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC (together, “UBS”);
  2. The London Gold Market Fixing Ltd. (“LGMF”);
  3. the five LGMF fixing banks during the Class Period:
    1. The Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”)
    2. Barclays
    3. Deutsche Bank
    4. HSBC
    5. Société Générale (collectively, the “Fixing Banks”).

The Plaintiffs
Individuals and entities that sold physical gold, gold futures traded on the Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX”) market,shares in gold exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), or options on gold ETFs during the Class Period.

What are the defendants accused of?

The Plaintiffs Allege:

1-Defendants colluded artificially to suppress the price of gold in several ways:

  1. First, leading up to the London PM Fixing, Defendants allegedly collected confidential client order information and then improperly shared that information amongst themselves in order to compare and coordinate the execution of particularly large sell trades, thereby driving down the gold spot price immediately before and during the Fixing call
  2. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants used manipulative trading tactics:
    1. “Giving Ammo” – building orders by transferring them between fellow conspirators
    2. “Painting the Screen”- placing fake orders to give the illusion of activity and then cancelling the orders when the fixing window closed
    3. “Spoofing”- placing large orders that are never executed
    4. “Wash Sales”-placing large orders that are executed then quickly reversed
    5. “Front Running”- of customer orders in order artificially to suppress the price

2-Defendants Caused Price Distortions Around the Gold Fixing

  1. A basic premise of Plaintiffs’ argument is that, absent collusion or manipulation, trading around the PM Fixing would have been “random” in the sense that gold prices would have been equally likely to move up or down around the PM Fixing
  2. Instead, from 2001 through 2012, the spot price of gold moved downward around the Gold Fixing much more frequently than it moved upward.

3-Defendants Profited From Manipulating the Fix Price

  1. First, Plaintiffs generally allege that Defendants used their foreknowledge of downward swings in the Fix Price to make advantageous trades across a variety of Gold Investments.
  2. Defendants’ manipulation of the PM Fixing gave them an unfair advantage over counterparties that were not also Fixing Banks by reducing their risk in “digital options” and other contracts with market-based triggers, such as “stop loss” orders and margin calls


Deutsche Bank Settles Prior to the Ruling

Plaintiffs notified the Court that they had reached a settlement with Deutsche Bank, although no motion for approval of a Settlement Class has yet been presented to the Court
Defendant Deutsche Bank was a LGMF member until May 2014 when it resigned its seat after trying, but failing, to sell the seat to another institution in the wake of an investigation by German regulators into potential manipulation in the precious metals markets.

What is the Defenses’ Argument?

In Summary, The Fixing Banks argue that, because Plaintiffs fail to allege that they transacted at a specific time in the trading day when the impact of Defendants’ alleged manipulation persisted, Plaintiffs “fail to allege that they ever ‘engaged in a transaction at a time during which prices were artificial,'” and therefore have not asserted an injury-in-fact. other arguments involving statute limitations and plaintiffs not being market “enforcers” are relevant.

What do the Plaintiffs want done?

Plaintiff’s Seek From the Court:

  1. to recover losses suffered as a result of Defendants’ alleged manipulation and suppression of the price of gold through the gold “fixing” process
  2.  putative claims for
    1. unlawful restraint of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act
    2. market manipulation in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)
    3. employment of a manipulative or deceptive device and false reporting in violation of CEA and CFTC rules
    4. principal-agent liability in violation of the CEA
    5. aiding and abetting manipulation in violation of the CEA
    6. unjust enrichment.

Summary of Judge’s Opinion and Order

Judge  Caproni gives opinions on the relevant law intended  to explain and rationalize her decisons. Those are largely on the first page of the decision. More Factually, she decides what, if any allegations have merit for further litigation. These are her decisions- VBL
1.      UBS’s Motion to DISMISS is GRANTED in its entirety
2.      Fixing Banks’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART
a.      GRANTED on Plaintiffs’ claim for unlawful restraint of trade December 31, 2005, and from January 1, 2013
b.      GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ manipulative device claims
c.      DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs’ antitrust claims for unlawful restraint of trade from January 1, 2006 through December 13, 2012
3.      LGMF’s Motion to Dismiss is:

  1. DENIED with respect to personal jurisdiction
  2. GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the same extent as the Fixing Banks’ Motion to Dismiss.


  • MS intends to stay on top of this case to the extent we are permitted.
  • It is our intention to have a representative in court on October 28th for updates and continued reporting as the situation unfolds.
  • We will continue to enlist Vince’s assistance navigatingthe labarynth of accusations adn merits, wiht opinions rendered as we become intimate with the case
  • Our staff has access to colleagues familiar with the governing law here, who will assist us in understanding to the laws, burden of proof, legal tactics used, and implications of decisions.

Significant Upcoming Dates

  1. Plaintiffs’ deadline to show good cause why leave to replead should be granted is October 17, 2016
  2. The parties, together with the parties in In re Silver Fixing, Ltd., Antitrust Litig., must meet and confer regarding a proposed schedule for discovery and class certification.
  3. The parties are required to submit a joint proposal (if possible) or separate proposals (if a joint proposal is not possible) by October 21, 2016
  4. The parties must appear for a pretrial conference on October 28, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. in New York
Posted by: the daily messenger | October 5, 2016

All The Ways You Can Comply (& Still Die) During An Encounter With Police

Submitted by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

How do you protect yourself from flying fists, choking hands, disabling electrified darts and killing bullets?

How do you defend yourself against individuals who have been indoctrinated into believing that they are superior to you, that their word is law, and that they have the power to take your life?

Most of all, how can you maintain the illusion of freedom when daily, Americans are being shot, stripped, searched, choked, beaten and tasered by police for little more than daring to frown, smile, question, challenge an order or just exist?

The short answer: you can’t.

Now for the long answer, which is far more complicated but still leaves us feeling hopeless, helpless and vulnerable to the fears, moods and misguided training of every cop on the beat.
If you ask police and their enablers what Americans should do to stay alive during encounters with law enforcement, they will tell you to comply (or die).

It doesn’t matter where you live—big city or small town—it’s the same scenario being played out over and over again in which Americans are being brainwashed into believing that anyone who wears a government uniform—soldier, police officer, prison guard—must be obeyed without question, while government agents, hyped up on their own authority and the power of their uniform, ride roughshod over the rights of the citizenry.

The problem, of course, is what to do when compliance is not enough.

I’m not talking about the number of individuals—especially young people—who are being shot and killed by police for having a look-alike gun in their possession, such as a BB gun. I’m not even talking about people who have been shot for brandishing weapons at police, such as scissors.
I’m talking about the growing numbers of unarmed people are who being shot and killed for just standing a certain way, or moving a certain way, or holding something—anything—that police could misinterpret to be a gun, or igniting some trigger-centric fear in a police officer’s mind that has nothing to do with an actual threat to their safety.

Killed for standing in a “shooting stance.” In California, police opened fire on and killed a mentally challenged—unarmed—black man allegedly because he removed a vape from his pocket and took a “shooting stance.” 37 rounds fired into his bloody corpse by a black cop.

Killed for holding a cell phone. Police in Arizona shot a man who was running away from U.S. Marshals after he refused to drop an object that turned out to be a cellphone. 31 bullets fired into his body.

Killed for holding a baseball bat. Chicago police shot and killed a 19-year-old college student who was carrying a baseball bat around the apartment where he and his father lived, as he was heading out to the playground to hit a few balls. Including two double tap shots to the head while he was down.

Killed for opening the front door. Bettie Jones was fatally shot—over and over again until she stopped moving—when she attempted to open the front door for police responding to a domestic disturbance call.

Killed for being a child in a car pursued by police. Jeremy David Mardis, six years old and autistic, died after police opened fire on a car in which he was a passenger. Over 60 rounds were fired into the little boy strapped into his car seat by black cops.

Killed for attacking police with a metal spoon. In Alabama, police shot and killed a 50-year-old man who reportedly charged a police officer while holding “a large metal spoon in a threatening manner.” Claiming they were defending themselves, they fired over 80 rounds into his body, including denying EMS workers from helping the dying man.

Killed for running in an aggressive manner holding a tree branch. Georgia police shot and killed a 47-year-old man wearing only shorts and tennis shoes who ran towards police holding a stick in an “aggressive manner.” Turns out, he was just out jogging and couldn’t hear him because of head phones. He was shit over 35 times by black cops.

Killed for crawling around naked. Atlanta police shot and killed an unarmed man who was reported to have been “acting deranged, knocking on doors, crawling around on the ground naked.” Police fired two shots at the man after he reportedly starting running towards them. After he was cuffed, they emptied their service weapons into his body, killing him.

Killed because a police officer accidentally pulled out his gun instead of his taser. An Oklahoma man suspected of trying to sell an illegal handgun was shot and killed after a 73-year-old reserve deputy inadvertently fired his gun instead of his taser. The black cop FIRED HIS GUN until the clip was empty, 15 rounds at point blank range.

Killed for wearing dark pants and a basketball jersey. Donnell Thompson, a mentally disabled 27-year-old described as gentle and shy, was shot and killed after police—searching for a carjacking suspect reportedly wearing similar clothing—encountered him lying motionless in a neighborhood yard. Sleeping in the yard, they shot him over 75 times, including shotgun blasts to the head.

Killed for telling police you lawfully own a firearm and have a conceal-and-carry permit. Philando Castile was shot and killed during a routine traffic stop allegedly over a broken tail light. As he was reaching for his license and registration, Castile explained to police that he had a  conceal-and-carry permit. That’s all it took for police to shoot Castile four times in the presence of his girlfriend and her 4-year-old daughter, who were also shot in the face and their cell phones stolen.

Killed for leaving anywhere at all when a police officer pulls up. Deravis Caine Rogers was killed after starting to drive away from an apartment complex right around the same time as a police officer pulled up. Despite the fact that the police officer had no reason to believe Rogers was a threat or was suspected of any illegal activity, the officer fired into Rogers’ passenger side window, killing his young daughter and continued firing into the car with two weapons until empty, slaying everyone inside – all children.

Killed for driving while deaf. In North Carolina, a state trooper shot and killed 29-year-old Daniel K. Harris—who was deaf—after Harris initially failed to pull over during a traffic stop.

Killed for being homeless. Los Angeles police shot an unarmed homeless man after he failed to stop riding his bicycle and then proceeded to run from police. He was shot by black cops over 90 times.

Killed for being old and brandishing a shoehorn. John Wrana, a 95-year-old World War II veteran, lived in an assisted living center, used a walker to get around, and was shot and killed by police who mistook the shoehorn in his hand for a 2-foot-long machete and fired multiple beanbag rounds from a shotgun at close range, who then approached the disabled elderly man and shot him 20 times in the face and chest.

Killed for having your car break down on the road. Terence Crutcher, unarmed and black, was shot and killed by a black Oklahoma police after his car broke down on the side of the road. Crutcher was shot in the back 15 times while walking towards his car with his hands up.

Killed for holding a garden hose. California police were ordered to pay $6.5 million after they opened fire on a man holding a garden hose watering his lawn, believing it to be a gun. Douglas Zerby was shot 12 times and pronounced dead on the scene.

Now you can make all kinds of excuses to justify these shootings, and in fact that’s exactly what you’ll hear from politicians, police unions, law enforcement officials and individuals who are more than happy to march in lockstep with the police. However, to suggest that a good citizen is a compliant citizen and that obedience will save us from the police state is not only recklessly irresponsible, but it is also deluded and out of touch with reality, because in the American police state, compliance is no longer enough. None of the above cops ever went to jail or were charged with murder.

Frankly, as these incidents make clear, the only truly compliant, submissive and obedient citizen in a police state is a dead one.

If you’re starting to feel somewhat overwhelmed, intimidated and fearful for your life and your property, you should be.

As I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, “we the people” are now at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”

Sad, isn’t it, how quickly we have gone from a nation of laws—where the least among us had just as much right to be treated with dignity and respect as the next person (in principle, at least)—to a nation of law enforcers (revenue collectors with weapons) who treat us all like suspects and criminals?

In police training, citizens are referred to as ZOMBIES…think about how that conditions their mindset.

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 5, 2016

Is the USA in End Times Prophecy – USA reincarnation of Ancient Egypt

Posted by: the daily messenger | October 5, 2016

Fake UFO cults mind control

Older Posts »